You may compare both apps for yourself, but iGetter seems more mature than Folx (comparing the features that exist in both apps). more than two threads, speed control, scheduling) have no trial. All iGetter functions can be tried in the unregistered version for unlimited period. iGetter shows a lot more information about the finished downloads (including referrer web page, avg.speed, elapsed time, finished date). Folx downloading stalls and fluctuates constantly.ģ. I used the public IP for externel and internal ip for internal.I. ![]() but when i try throught outside network it is not working. i can run the applicaiton through internel network (office network) and it worked with out any issues. Folx speed varies so much that I can't see any usable speed/estimate time value. User-2079787324 posted i am trying to create a simple FTP webapps. iGetter speed is stable and Elapsed+Estimate times are correct. I measured the elapsed time with a chronograph app, because Folx has no Elapsed time value (except by extracting dates in the the Log).Ģ. iGetter is faster than Folx with a difference of avg. I downloaded 5 times with each app, iTunes12.4.1.dmg from the Apple servers (alternating Folx and iGetter, both with two threads). I compared iGetter 2.9.4 with Folx 5.0 and since I posted a review on the Folx page, I think that the results may be interesting for the iGetter users as well.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |